HELL IN HEAVEN? HEAVEN IN HELL? (C-1)

Part APart BPart C

C-1: Fate of Judas
C-2: Rewards, Rehabilitation, or Both?
C-3: A Word of Comfort
C-4: “Everlasting Punishment… Forever and Ever” – What does that Mean?
C-5: Deliverance from the Lake of Fire? Society of the Future!
C-6: Lake of Fire – What Is It For?
C-7: Conclusion

C-1: Fate of Judas

As several of Jesus’ parables pointed out – the parables of the two servants, the foolish virgins, the talents and the minas – there is the possibility of what Gabriel had pointed out long ago: many of those who have come to Christ, although members of the Kingdom, will, nevertheless, have to endure something called “shame and everlasting contempt”.

Likely, this is reserved for the worst offenders: the Judases and betrayers, the hypocritical persecutors of the true Christians, those who have fought unjust wars in the name of Christ, those who have led others astray, and so on. Not only will they be deprived of the honors and rewards given to those who “shall awake to everlasting life”, but they will have to undergo the painful and shattering realization of their errors – agony of spirit as suggested in the phrase “weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Daniel 12:2, Matthew 8:12, 22:13, 24:51, Luke 13:28)

How much better, in our earthly lives, to follow the apostle Peter’s advice to remain vigilant in spirit: “Therefore, brethren, be even more diligent to make your call and election sure, for if you do these things you will never stumble; for so an entrance will be supplied to you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” (2Peter 1:10-11)

The implication here is that believers can arrive in poor shape upon their “entrance into the eternal kingdom”. Conversely, what about those who practice these virtues to the best of their ability but have not heard Christ’s message in a way that they could properly understand or receive? Would they not be deserving of a place in the Kingdom?

In Romans 2 Paul makes a strong case along this line about the people who didn’t happen to know what the Jewish people knew about the law and the ways of God. “For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law, these, although not having the law, are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness.”

Then Paul goes on to say, “And will not the physically uncircumcised, if he fulfills the law, judge you who, even with your written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the law?… For there is no partiality with God.” (Romans 2:14-15,27,11)

There almost seems to be an intersection here between the realms of believers and unbelievers. That is, there’s not much difference between the person who comes to the Lord but falls away and the person who never came to the Lord but tried to live a decent life. 

The lapsed believer, who is already in the Kingdom, must shed the wrong attitudes that led him astray before he may continue his journey further into the Kingdom. The unbeliever also has things to learn; first and foremost is the issue of accepting the authority of Christ. This probably won’t be very difficult once earthly traditions and customs and culture have been stripped away at the time of death. The only ones who will find it difficult to “come to the Light” would be those who are “practicing evil” and don’t want that their “deeds should be exposed.” (John 3:20)

Paul is making the case that some of the Jews who knew the law and were hypocritical were “lower on the scale”, so to speak, than those Gentiles who, even though ignorant of the law, were obeying it from their “hearts”“For not the hearers of the law are just in the sight of God, but the doers of the law will be justified.” (Romans 2:13-15)

Nowadays, we make perhaps a greater division between believers and non-believers than is necessary. And would not the same admonishment apply that Paul once gave to his Jews – those who did “rely upon the law and boast of your relation to God“? If believers are being hypocritical (while boasting of their “relation to God“), while many who don’t know Christ are trying to live godly lives, should not these latter receive a place of honor in the Kingdom, even though not officially saved at the time of their passing into the Realm Beyond? And would not this fulfill what Jesus meant when He said, “Many who are first will be last, and the last first”? (Matthew 19:30)

It is an undeniable truth that, within the general category of those who come to the Lord, there exist many who do not walk “worthy of the calling”. (Ephesians 4:1) (In fact, none of us can claim to have a perfect score in the “worthiness” department.) But some have lived lives that were a poor testimony, causing too many to stumble into unbelief and discouragement. 

This should come as no surprise.  From the passage in Romans 2 above, we learn of Paul’s issue with hypocritical Jewish teachers, probably certain members of the Early Church, of whom he said, “The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.” (Romans 2:24)

Peter also spoke of “false teachers… who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them… because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed.” (2Peter 2:1-2) If the Lord had “bought them”, then they must have come to the Lord at some point in their lives; they became part of the family of God and so would not be “cast out”. But as in many a family, often there is a wayward son or daughter who causes the family no end of trouble and grief.

In Jesus’ own “family” of disciples, He had His “Judas”, who committed the grave sin of betraying the Master. It was a foolish mistake, and he repented of it later. “Then Judas, His betrayer, seeing that He had been condemned, was remorseful and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, ‘I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.’” (Matthew 27:3-4)

Now certainly, Judas had come to Christ; he was one of His disciples. This then would have been enough to grant him entrance into the Kingdom. But at what level? “Shame and everlasting contempt” would seem his likely destination.

But Jesus did make this unusual statement about Judas: “none of them is lost except the son of perdition (or “destruction).” (John 17:12) And it almost sounds as if Judas was destined for the Lake of Fire. Likely though, his fate wasn’t so drastic. What was drastic, or tragic, was the fact that Judas would commit suicide, he would become “lost” as a disciple, and he “lost” what could have been his place of honor in the Kingdom of God.

We might compare this with another statement where Jesus, explaining about conditions of persecution in the very End Time, said, “He who endures to the end shall be saved.” (Matthew 24:13) He was not talking here about the gift of general salvation, which does not require any pre-condition of a lifetime of faithfulness. But rather, the subject is about a time when many will be tempted to “betray one another” and, like Judas, defect over to the side of the enemies of God. (Matthew 24:10)

So what does He mean here? What is it that those “who endure” will be “saved” from? Well, here is where it will help to realize that within the Kingdom of God there exists this “shame and everlasting contempt” domain, where the faithful will not have to go. The implication is there too that, for those who do have to go there, conditions in that domain will be tough. (More on this later.)

Jesus once spoke to Peter in terms similar to what He said about Judas: “He turned and said to Peter, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.’” (Matthew 16:23) Jesus was not calling Peter a devil, but he was addressing the evil spirit who was influencing him.

Like Peter, Judas had become a “son of perdition” temporarily because he was allowing himself to be influenced by the Devil – and so much so that he committed the grievous crime of betraying the Son of God. Nevertheless, it was a temporary aberration, as evidenced by his remorse afterwards. In a sense it was no different to Peter’s blunder: trying to stop Jesus from following the path of sacrifice and death; or later, when he denied knowing Jesus.

The difference between Judas and Peter, however, was that Peter, despite his anguish over his failure – “Peter went out and wept bitterly” (Luke 22:62) – he didn’t abandon his hope and trust but persisted; he kept on believing in God’s powerful saving grace and mercy.

Who knows if Judas, instead of committing suicide, had had more faith in God’s saving mercy and been willing to humbly and courageously face the consequences – the shame that his actions brought him – then he might have continued, found forgiveness, and had a fruitful life in God’s service and final reward at the end?

Some translations say that Judas “changed his mind” (instead of “was remorseful”). Both are probably right. Judas was much like king Saul, who also was afflicted by an evil spirit. His jealousy over the future king David prompted him to spend years trying to find and kill him. When David confronted Saul about his behavior, Saul felt remorse for a time. Saul’s lack of humble faith, however, led him back into the same vengeful pattern as before.

Both Saul and Judas were like a “double-minded man” whom James says is “unstable in all his ways” – unstable because of his “doubting” God’s “wisdom” or for not seeking it in the first place. (James 1:5-7) The lives of both Saul and Judas ended the same – by committing suicide.

If nothing else, Saul’s life was a dandy bad example of what not to do. Yet David continued to call him the “Lord’s anointed”, for Saul had been chosen by God at the beginning of his reign. (1Samuel 24:10) For this reason it’s hard to imagine that Saul would have been sent to Hell at his death. But to go to a realm like “shame and everlasting contempt” within the Kingdom of God would seem the appropriate place for him. And we could probably say the same for Judas Iscariot as well.

And perhaps also, we could say the same thing for Christians in the End Time who receive the mark of the Beast. According to Revelation 14:10, those who worship the Beast (the Antichrist) “shall be tormented with fire and brimstone”, that is, enter the Lake of Fire. That could include a lot of people. However, there may also be an in-between category – those who don’t like the Antichrist and don’t worship him in their hearts but end up taking the mark, for the sake of survival or for other reasons.

True enough, it is a compromise and a poor testimony. Nevertheless, the Lord “looks at the heart” and not the “outward appearance”. (1Samuel 16:7) So it seems reasonable to suppose that many people in this in-between category (whether Christians or non-Christians) would not be sent to the Lake of Fire, although they would have to endure correction in the Afterlife in a “Death and Hades” purgatory, or in some sort of “shame and everlasting contempt” situation.

Indeed, the Scripture seems to lay down two conditions: number one – “if anyone worships the beast and his image”; and number two – “receives his mark” (Revelation 14:9) Worshiping the Beast would be the main reason for someone to get sent to the Lake of Fire. Receiving the mark is the secondary reason, the outward action which may or may not correspond to the state of a person’s heart.

Christians, in their heart, cannot worship the Antichrist; however, as we know from Matthew 24:24, the influence of “false Christs and false prophets” in the End Time is so strong that it will be difficult, even for the elect, not to be deceived by them. This implies that there will be a lot of decent people, and probably even Christians, who will be overwhelmed by the Antichrist and the False Prophet into compromising and receiving the “mark” – even though in their hearts they do not “worship” the Antichrist. (For more information on this point, see Appendix 1.)

The elite of the “elect” are the super-overcomers who manage to resist the temptation to give in to the new world leaders and their system. They are “faithful unto death”, and although they “have little strength”, yet they have kept God’s Word and “not denied” His name. (Revelation 2:10, 3:8) They are the ones “who had not worshiped the beast or his image, AND had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands.”  (Revelation 20:4) By refusing the “mark”, their inward belief matches with their outward actions. (For more information on this point about the “elect”, see Appendix 2.)

It was mentioned earlier that certain elements in the Christian world are guilty of fomenting wars, promoting intolerance, persecuting less established religious groups. These are they of whom Christ warned, “The time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service… And these things they will do to you because they have not known the Father nor Me.” (John 16:2-3, 15:21) There are those who use God’s name for their own ends.

If in some cases, such persons had once come to Christ, then they certainly have gone far, far astray. So what happens to them? Knowing that such glaring hypocrisy can exist, even among believers, we can understand why the provision of “shame and everlasting contempt” is mentioned by Gabriel; it is the fate awaiting some of the “sons of your people” who are badly in need of correction. (Daniel 12:2)

“And now, little children, abide in Him, so that when He appears we may have confidence and not shrink from Him in shame at His coming.” (1John 2:28, ESV) In John 3:20-21 we learn that those who are “practising evil” cannot or will “not come to the Light”. In a similar way, those who did “come to the Light” but failed to “abide in Him” during their lifetimes will “shrink in shame” when Christ appears.

They are still in Heaven, of course, not Hell, but find that, instead of the honor they could have had, they are faced with having in their hands a shameful testimony of a life lived in rebellion to the Light they had once embraced. Although it won’t be easy, nevertheless, if they did enter the Kingdom at some point in their lives, they will be honored for that and for whatever good they have done, and they will not be denied God’s mercy and lovingkindness.

In His Sermon on the Mount, Jesus made this startling observation: “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’” (Matthew 7:21-23)

From this we might figure that these people whom Jesus talks about never came to Him at all. And what He says to them would be true, “I never new you.” They would be like the “sons of Sceva” in Acts 19 who tried to make lucrative use of Christ’s name to prosper themselves in their exorcism trade. Such “works” are nothing but an empty show, a going-through-the-motions exercise to impress audiences or elicit funds; such imposters and con artists would hardly be worthy to enter the Kingdom.

To them, the “depart from Me” phrase would mean “go to Hell”. Among these are many who “think that they offer God service” by killing the true followers of Christ “because they have not known the Father nor Me.”  (John 16:2-3)

But there may be some who did come to the Lord at some point in their lives, but later their relationship became distant, and they strayed off into that kind of shell game that Jesus was giving examples of. It would seem that some of these will “depart”, not into Hell, but into what we could call Hell in Heaven: “shame and everlasting contempt” – exile into the outer fringes of the Kingdom.

Many of these may have thought they deserved to be “first” in the Kingdom – “have we not done many wonders in Your name?” - but wake up at the end of their lives to the rude shock of finding themselves bumped down into the “last” category. In such cases, the “depart from Me” phrase means “go to shame and everlasting contempt” – meaning they are still in the Kingdom but locked out of its full blessings and privileges.

As mentioned before, the same basic rules apply to believers and unbelievers. And if believers disobey God’s rule of love (“practice lawlessness”), then it should be no surprise if they wind up experiencing similar things to what unbelievers do who also “practice lawlessness”. Members of the Kingdom they may be, and no doubt happy to have landed in that wonderful heavenly environment. However, their landing place may be rather close to that boundary separating Hell and Heaven.

Fortunately, as far as human souls are concerned, any movement across that boundary only goes in one direction – from the Kingdom of Hell to the Kingdom of Heaven. Christ’s guarantee remains in force: “the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out.” (John 6:37) But in the case of those who who build with “wood, hay, straw”, they will be “saved, yet so as through fire.” (1Corinthians 3:15)

And some unbelievers (the “last”) who receive Christ in the Afterlife may well end up “first” ahead of believers who did not “walk worthy of the calling”. (Ephesians 4:1)

Heaven is by no means a classless society, and whoever happens to land in the basement category will, of course, be glad to be in Heaven but will have to live with the memory of how they shamed the Gospel of Christ during their earthly lifetimes. The Scriptures do speak of God being “ashamed” of some of His people: “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed.” (Mark 8:38) And “not ashamed” of others, such as those who “obtained a good testimony” during their earthly lives: “God is not ashamed to be called their God, for He has prepared a city for them”. (Hebrews 11:2,16,39)

Regarding those whom Christ was not happy with, even some who, it seemed, had done great works for God, the apostle Paul expressed it well when he wrote that without love our works will mean nothing.  No amount of spiritual gifts, understanding of mysteries, faith to move mountains, sacrificial actions will suffice if they are not accompanied with the right motive – of loving God and others. (1Corinthians 13:1-3)

Although believers’ names have been “written in the Book of Life”, some are bound to end up like Judas Iscariot. Because of their waywardness, they can even turn into enemies of Christ and His true children. Yet they are forgiven; the path to full restoration may be a rocky one, but they are forgiven.

Continue to C-2: Rewards, Rehabilitation, or Both?
Appendix 1: What is the Distinction between Worshiping the Beast and Receiving the Mark?

To understand what seems utterly paradoxical – Christians, worshipers of Christ who receive the mark of the Beast – following are some thoughts on this:

When a person gets saved (born again), it is the usual custom for them to then get baptized. The water-baptism serves as the outward evidence of a person’s inward belief and conversion; it also facilitates a person’s membership amongst groups of other believers. The Devil’s counterfeit version is similar in some ways: the mark serves as the outward evidence of a person’s inward “conversion” to the Antichrist and also facilitaes his or her entry into the buying and selling system of the Antichrist and False Prophet.

Now we recognize too that some people get saved yet never get baptized; water baptism is not an absolute essential in the salvation process. In addition, it is not hard to imagine that some people who are not saved might get themselves baptized for the sake of some gain or advantage. A pastor is supposed to vet baptism candidates to make sure they are actually saved and understand what it means. But it wouldn’t be hard to imagine that some pretenders will slip by undetected, and so baptism is not always a foolproof method or evidence of a person’s conversion. Nevertheless, some denominations assert that a person cannot be saved without getting water-baptized, a doctrine that elevates water-baptism to the level of a foolproof way of knowing a person is genuinely saved. And we often think of the mark in similar terms, that it is a foolproof indication of a person’s worship of the beast.

Like the custom of baptism, the “mark”  is only the outward evidence of a person’s inward “conversion” (to worship of the Antichrist Beast), which also permits entrance and participation in the buying and selling system created by the False Prophet. And just as some deceptive people may try to get themselves baptized without actually committing themselves to Christ, so some Christians may take the mark, for similar reasons, for the sake of gain or advantage, even though, in their hearts, they don’t worship the Antichrist. The “mark”, like water baptism, is not a totally foolproof way to determine if someone is a genuine worshiper (of the Beast).

Two Scriptures do mention only the “worship” factor for the followers of the Beast and make the point that they “will worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb.” (Revelation 13:8, 17:8) This could be taken to mean that any worshiper of the Beast, regardless of whether or not they take the mark, will not be written in the Book of Life and will end up in the Lake of Fire. And this parallels how it is with the worshipers of Christ: if they came to the Lord at some point in their lives, then they are written in the Book of Life, regardless of whether or not they ever got water-baptized. They will be spared from the Lake of Fire – even if they have made the shameful compromise of receiving the mark of the Beast. “No one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand.” (John 10:28-29)

Other passages in the Revelation Book make the point that there are two factors in the worship service of the Beast. (13:11-18, 14:9, 16:2, 19:20, 20:4) There is the mark AND there is the factor of worship; and this could be taken to mean that, to get sent to the Lake of Fire, it is not limited to the outward act of receiving the mark, but also it is an inward matter of the heart – that of being devoted and committed to the Beast.

In Revelation 13:11-18 it is fairly clear that the “worship” factor is of primary importance, while the “mark” seems to have lesser importance as far as “worship” is concerned; in that passage the mark is more clearly linked with economic survival than with any religious aspect, and it is difficult to guess that the mark is supposed to be part of the False Prophet’s worship service of the Antichrist. The mark is described mainly as a way of coeercing people into joining the camp of the Antichrist and False Prophet. This could be compared to what happened in communist Russia: many people were coerced out of fear of persecution and deprivation, so they feigned allegiance to the communist state, even though in their hearts they did not agree with it.

Actually, a lot of people, not just wayward Christians, may fall into this category of those who take the mark but are not really worshipers of the Beast. And before the Great White Throne Judgment comes, presumably while in the realm of Death and Hades, they will have opportunity to repent and get their names written in the Book of Life, which will spare them from getting sent to the Lake of Fire.

And for Christians who take the mark, even though they will not go to the Lake of Fire, they will, because of their compromise, probably land in that purgatorial realm known as “shame and everlasting contempt”. (Daniel 12:2) They will be “saved, yet so as through fire” at the “Judgment Seat of Christ”, as Paul put it. (1Corinthians 3:15, 2Corinthians 5:10) They are in the Kingdom, but as Hebrews 12 explains, will have to “endure chastening”“For whom the LORD loves He shastens, and scourges every son whom He receives… for what son is there whom a father does not chasten?” (Hebrews 12:6-7) By coming to Christ, they have become “sons”, but in His love the Father does have to chasten His wayward sons and daughters before they can be restored and brought into higher realms of blessing, privilege, and responsibility.

[RETURN]

Appendix 2: The “elect” – a general and specific term

There are several terms in the Bible that seem to have both a general and a specific meaning: Sheol or Hades can be understood generally as the Afterlife domain for the dead; in its more specific usage, these terms point to a region of misery in the Afterlife for the souls of evildoers. The term Jews in the New Testament can refer generally to the Jewish people, or specifically, to the Jewish elders who fought against Christ’s teachings. “You who fear the Lord” was a term used in the Old Testament to refer, specifically, to faithful Israelites, and generally, to the Gentiles and all peoples who had and would come to worship the true God.

The “he who overcomes” phrase in the Revelation Book refers generally to those “who believe that Jesus is the Son of God”; (1John 5:5) more specifically however, this phrase points to those who are faithful unto death and receive the crown of life. The same may also be said for the term “elect”. One translation of Matthew 24:24 seems to emphasize this distinction, mentioning that even the “very elect” would have a hard time avoiding the deceptions of “false Christs and false prophets” (KJV) – which leaves open the possibility that some of the “elect” will fall into the traps and snares of those days and end up receiving the mark.  

[RETURN]

Continue to C-2: Rewards, Rehabilitation, or Both?

Speak Your Mind

*

© Copyright 2014 Endtime Upgrade · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Studio99 Network UK · Admin