1 – Introduction
2 – Worldwide Worship (Adulation) of the Antichrist
3 – The “Miracles” that Don’t Work and Those that Do Work
4 – How does Singular Change into Plural?
5 – Seemingly Miraculous Nature of the Image
6 – Destructive Power of the Image
7 – A New Initiation Rite
8 – Conclusion

5 – Seemingly Miraculous Nature of the Image

Then the next phrase: Revelation 13:15A And he had power [“It was granted to him” - NKJV] to give life unto the image of the beast…

As far as the Apostle was concerned, here is where the earth-Beast’s magical power manifested itself. In an ancient culture, the best way to encourage worship of a god was to make its idol come to life in some way. This was the aspect of the “image” that stood out to John. And so he puts much emphasis on it, explaining it according to how he imagines the image’s “life” came about – by those “miracles” done “in the sight of the beast”. (13:14-15) He might have figured that was the False Prophet’s main role – to do the seemingly impossible job of giving “life” to the image.  After all, what did he know about TV broadcasting, electromagnetic wave transmission, or even electricity? In reality though, it’s all just technology, and that “impossible miracle” will be carried out by the False Prophet’s TV broadcasting networks. His control over the media corporations will insure widespread proliferation of the “image” – the broadcasted image that will exert enormous influence over the world of the future.

Now, it is true that the “life” of the image – the fact that it’s the real thing – is the crucial factor that engenders worship amongst the masses of the world. And John’s viewpoint is similar: he could perceive that somehow the life-power of the beast was getting transferred into the images that he figured people must have “made” for themselves. And in part, that’s true; it is the Antichrist’s life-power, even spiritual power, that will be transmitted via the air waves. Of course, what John didn’t understand was that those “miracles”, those technological miracles, did a lot more than just bring the “image” to “life”;  they also created the “image” (in “reflection” form) and distributed it into every corner of the world. The whole process was simultaneous and instantaneous – what we call broadcasting a TV image. But for him, it was impossible to grasp this, to realize how streamlined the whole process was going to become. So he separates the different aspects of the process, explaining it in cumbersome terms according to his understanding of what the process of creating, distributing, and giving life to an image would entail.

Another point to remember: It isn’t necessarily the person, the False Prophet, who gives “life” to the image. The “he” in this passage refers to the “beast from the earth”, the system that operates under the leadership of the False Prophet; the actual term “false prophet” doesn’t appear until chapter 19. Like the other “beast from the sea” (the Antichrist), these “beast” terms describe both the person and the system that the person is the head of. And it is sometimes difficult to tell in a passage whether it’s the person being referred to, or his empire, or both. (See Footnote for a discussion about the personification of the term “beast”.)

Now indirectly, the False Prophet does perform the miracle – by influencing the media systems to give favorable coverage to the Antichrist. But it’s not as if he himself is doing any kind of hocus-pocus to make images come alive. That “miracle” gets delegated to the TV broadcasting systems to perform. And the apostle, not knowing how else to understand it, describes this modern wonder of technology as a miraculous occurrence.

An interesting sideline here worth noting: From the vision John understood that the earth-Beast had a great deal of power, which, in his clumsy way, he expresses as the ability to get everyone in the world to possess an “image” of the Antichrist and then to “give life” to their images (verses 14-15). What this suggests, when we apply these words to modern reality, is that the earth-Beast, or False Prophet, runs the television broadcasting industry. The great domain of media power in the earth lies mostly under his control. And if he controls it, then he must own it. And if he owns it, then he must be fabulously wealthy.

The same can be said about this Beast’s power to cause everyone to receive the “mark” for buying and selling (13:16-17). If he’s capable of doing that, then it implies that he must control and own the computer credit systems of the financial world, pointing again to the fact that he must be fabulously wealthy. We can understand then why verse 11 of this chapter says about the earth-Beast that “he exerciseth all the power of the first beast… and causeth the earth… to worship the first beast.” 

(This feature about the False Prophet’s dominion over the world’s material wealth is covered more thoroughly in the post “Shape of the Future: Economic Superpower – The New Beast”.)

Continue to Chapter 6: Destructive Power of the Image


Footnote: Personification of the Beast

Revelation 13 starts with a description of the world’s final empire as a horrific-looking “beast” with horns and heads and features of a leopard, bear, and lion. As the passage continues, the “beast” seems to transition from empire into person: “they worshiped the beast” (in the ancient “beast” empires, it was common for emperors – persons – to be worshiped); “a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies” (Hitler, an example of an Antichrist-type person, had great speaking ability); “worship the image of the beast” (if the “beast” actually looked like a beast, instead of like a person, who would want to worship an “image” like that?). (13:4,5,15)

Further ahead in chapter 17, we read, “The seven heads are seven mountains… And there are seven kings.” (17:9-10) The “seven heads… mountains” are the seven empires that have ruled and will rule over the land of Israel – Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, and the final Antichrist empire. The word “mountains” symbolizes empires/governments. (as in Daniel 2:35,44, Isaiah 2:2-3, Micah 4:1) Then the passage states, “There are seven kings.” So “king” and “mountain” are inter-connected. It is as if the one cannot do without the other. A body without a head isn’t going to get very far; an empire needs to have a dynamic and strong leader to unify and give it direction, plus be the head that people can look up to, or even worship. And vice-versa, a head without a body won’t get very far; an emperor cannot call himself that unless he has an empire behind him.

This use of the “beast” symbolism to represent specific persons, not just their empires, started in the Book of Daniel. In chapter 7, Daniel had a vision in which “four great beasts rose out of the sea.” (verse 3) He describes the first “beast” thus: “The first was like a lion, and had eagle’s wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man’s heart was given to it.” (7:4) Here we have an obvious reference to the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar whose “heart” was changed. Because of his cruelty and misrule, God had to curse Nebuchadnezzar with a “beast’s heart” – some form of insanity. The king eventually returned to his right mind after seven years and “blessed the Most High”. (4:16,34)“A man’s heart was given” to him. (7:4)

In another example (chapter 2), as Daniel was interpreting king Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, he tells the king, “Thou art this head of gold.” (2:38) Nebuchadnezzar, the person, was the “head of gold” in that dream of a “great image, whose brightness was excellent” and its “form… terrible (awe-inspiring). (2:31) The “great image” in the form of a person draws attention to the fact that emperor-worship was the feature of those empires that the coming of the Messiah (the “stone”) would change. But lest we think the “image” symbolized only the kings of empires, we see the word “kingdom” used in verses 39-42 in reference to the arms, belly, legs, and feet of the “great image”.

So what about the question, does the “image of the beast” refer to the personified version of the “beast” (the Antichrist)? Or is it somehow the image of a disembodied entity, this horrific-looking “beast”? From what we’ve learned about the interchangeability of these mountain-versus-king and king-versus-kingdom terms, there should be no difficulty in understanding that this “image of the beast” refers to the likeness of the person of the Antichrist.


Speak Your Mind


© Copyright 2014 Endtime Upgrade · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Studio99 Network UK · Admin